Skip to main content

Contrasting Techniques for Periodic Review of Process Hazards

Gerry Brennan, ABB Engineering Services, Teesside, UK

It is widely accepted that in order to manage process safety it is necessary to have a periodic review of hazards on existing installations and this is required in some regulatory authorities’ guidance, typically with a five year interval.

In the UK Oil and Gas Operators have mainly employed one of two risk assessment techniques for carrying out periodic hazard review. This paper will briefly describe the nature of process hazards, then describe both HAZOP (Hazard and Operability) and PHR (Process Hazard Review) and contrast experiences of applying the techniques in a number of installations. Strengths and weaknesses will be considered including resource requirements, duration of study and the recommendations for improvement. Some findings from review of outcomes in recent applications will be presented, including one case where both HAZOP and PHR were applied to the same installations.

The paper will aid Oil and Gas Operators in selecting the appropriate technique for periodic hazard review of their installations.

LogIn Required

Register or Log In

Please sign into your account before placing an order on our website.

User registration enables us to offer GPA Members discounts and to ensure you have a valid email address.

Your account details, content purchases, registrations and a record of your previous orders are accessible from your account.

Past Paper Download

Past Paper Download
Price
£50.00
Variations
Currency Selection

My Licences

You have not purchased any GPA Europe Membership yet. Visit our Membership area to select the Membership that is right for you and checkout.